Digital Archaeology Maintainathon
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Reading list
  • 2026 Recap

On this page

  • Further reading

Perform a code review

Community
Review software you rely on and publish the appraisal where others will find it.

You may think, wait, is this something for a maintainathon? We say yes! Software reviews are valuable for people maintaining the software. It may give hints about what to improve and what to keep just as it is, as it works perfectly already. A review also raises awareness for the software, which is great for developers and potential users alike.

The Journal of Open Source Software is one such place to write about research software. They have a certain scope and focus on the developer side of things. If there is a smaller software package you would wish to review or you would like to focus on less technical details, other journals may be a better place. For example, Archäologische Informationen are happy to take software reviews (such as Thiery et al 2022).

This journal also published Recommendations for the review of archaeological research software, which might help you think of questions to ask yourself in regards to the software you are reviewing. Smaller reviews may also be a good topic for a blog or a social media post. Such appraisals are very valuable for researchers looking for the best solution to their problem!

Further reading

  • Journal of Open Source Software
  • Thiery et al. 2022
  • Recommendations for the review of archaeological research software
 

CC0 1.0 Universal | This page is built with ❤️ and Quarto, with theme from vetiver