CAA 2023, Amsterdam (S15)
Organised by James R. Allison, Sophie C. Schmidt and Florian Thiery
When: 2023-04-05,08:30-13:00 CEST
Where: Room E107, RAI Congress Center, Europaplein 24, 1078 GZ Amsterdam
This session aims at evaluating how reproducible research in archaeology is actually faring. It has been argued that reproducible research techniques such as publishing and sharing code as well as data speed up scientific progress (Marwick 2017, Schmidt & Marwick 2020). With the FAIR movement and the rise of (Linked) Open Data approaches there seem to be more and more archaeological data sets available. Code used for archaeological analysis is also increasingly published online. There are a growing number of openly available code examples that have been used for articles (see for R https://github.com/benmarwick/ctv-archaeology, or for Netlogo https://www.comses.net/codebases/?query=archaeology ). In some cases, this shared code may be adapted into “little helpers”, small modules of research software, aka Little Minions (Thiery et al. 2021), that can be reused and individually adapted. The community of Research Software Engineers (RSE), people who create software applications for research, is growing. For better dissemination of these programs, they created the FAIR4RS principles (Hong et al. 2022). RSEs are fighting for scientific recognition by e.g. implementing the CFF format to cite software (Anzt et al. 2020). But despite this general progress, published articles reusing or adapting open data or code are rare in archaeology. It is difficult to assess how often code and data are reused for research, but the rate of reuse appears to be low (Huggett 2018, Marwick and Birch 2018). Open data and code may be reused more often for teaching (Cook et al. 2018, Gartski 2022, Marwick et al. 2019), but it is not clear how often this happens. In this session we would like to ask the following questions
By discussing these topics we want to encourage the re-use of openly available data sets and published code in archaeology. We particularly welcome papers that reuse or adapt openly available code to analyze new datasets, or papers that reanalyze existing open data in new ways. We would very much like to see contributions that generate open code to replicate previous analyses or create newly open data sets from existing data that is currently difficult to access (e.g., data found only in printed tables in reports or articles). Papers that examine the use of open data and code in teaching are also very welcome. We hope to fuel a debate about the usefulness and worthwhileness of creating open data and code. Reproducibility needs to be evaluated not just from a theoretical viewpoint but also in practice.
Statistics, Data, and the History of the New Archaeology
James R. Allison
Percolation Package - From script sharing to package publication
Sophie C. Schmidt and Simon Maddison
XRONOS: a global open repository enhancing reproducible research with chronometric data
Martin Hinz and Joe Roe
Detection of Temporal Changes of the Omega House at the Athenian Agora
Antigoni Panagiotopoulou, Lemonia Ragia, Dorina Moullou, and Colin Wallace
Implementing a Database and Information System in a Heavily Heterogeneous Research Data Environment
Steffen Strohm
Efforts and outcomes to making the ROAD database reusable
Christian Sommer and Volker Hochschild
An Example of Data Integration Using the ArchaMap Application
Robert Bischoff, Matthew Peeples, and Daniel Hruschka
OpenHistoryMap - A case of reuse and refactoring
Silvia Bernardoni, Lucia Marsicano, Marco Montanari, and Raffaele Trojanis
Citizen science supports megalithic research - virtual reconstructions through old photographs
Louise Tharandt
PyREnArA – Spatio-temporal analysis of artefact morphology with multivariate approaches
Robin John, Florian Linsel, Hubert Mara, Georg Roth, Isabell Schmidt, and Andreas Maier
A special interest group of CAA International dedicated to scientific scripting languages in archaeology.
2023-04-05